Britney Spears' marriage to Kevin Federline seems to take up the tabloids' attention almost as much as Shiloh Jolie-Pitt at the moment, flooding readers with contradictory rumors and allegations and apparently putting great pressure on Britney.As it is, her statement that she would go to Namibia to have her second child with Kevin, a daughter, seems to be a desperate cry for privacy, in the footsteps of the Brangelina couple.
Their assured privacy in Namibia was very beneficial in many ways for them - both financially and when it comes to publicity - so there shouldn't be any reason why Britney couldn't reap the same benefits.
NBC's Matt Lauer took her statement that she will go to Namibia "in the near future" to give birth, in "late September or early November."
She justified her choice for Namibia stating: "Kevin has always been a fan of African-American culture, I'm sure he'll feel at home there, rapping with all the natives.
Besides, there's lots of quiet unpaved roads where Sean Preston and I can go driving."Her last remarque is clearly directed to the scandal concerning her motherly abilities, as she was photographed driving with her son on her lap.
She continued her interview, to be aired on Thursday on the "Today show" and on Friday on "Dateline" by drawing lines between Namibia and California "because it's on the ocean and there's lots of sand.
So if Sean Preston fell off his swing and landed on his head, there's less chance he would be hurt and we'd have those snoops from child welfare up our butts all the time.
"Finally she admitted to choosing Namibia because of the strict laws against paparazzi - "I heard that Namibia has laws that let celebrities say whether or not journalists are allowed in the country.
That's so important, even more important than getting the same villa that Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt had."Britney's obsession with seclusion and her obviously frail grasp on the effect of her own statements suggests she might really need this break from it all, to get it together.
Source
